hmm

i am not good at words i must say, i have nothing to blog about and im not a person with good command of language to start with;





someone told me good photos doesn't necessary produced from expensive cameras, i second that.

but somehow, after months of taking photos in underground clubs, outdoor events ' secretly', i realised taking photo in the state i lived in had some probations, like: you need to own a dslr to be part of the photograpers for events, or unless you have a photopass, yes i do know people are paid to do magazine covers, but somehow i was quite fed up with the fact that i can't even take photos for my own interest, to build up my own portfolios, stock-photos for design industry i will probably be getting into...


what have the world come to.?

even terry richardson, American Apparel Founder and photographer Dov Charney, Sue+Rynski( collaborated with hysteric glamour, most recent april 77) uses manual/film/compact cameras, so whats wrong?